Standish, Michigan crowd against bringing Gitmo detainees

Photo: Sarah Miller, The Bay City Times

Many of the 300 people who attended today’s meeting in Standish, Michigan were already against moving Gitmo’s detainees there; the rest left with more questions than they came with, according to town hall organizer and long-time Standish resident Dave Munson. I spoke with Mr. Munson this afternoon, after the meeting. He said, “The Department of Defense needs to come up here and be honest with us about how this would effect our community.” He added that, “Eighty-percent of the current prison guards [at Standish] are ineligible to apply to become federal prison guards due to age. Moving detainees here would save few of the jobs currently filled by locals and force them to relocate to find work. We want to keep people here, not merely replace them with someone else living in their homes.” Yet Mr. Munson’s greatest fear matches that of most in attendance in Standish today: the potential terrorist threat to the community.

The Bay City (Michigan) Times reports:

U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Holland and a candidate of Michigan governor in 2010, took the podium first and urged the people to push for transparency. Hoekstra has been one of the most vocal opponents of bringing Guantanamo detainees into the United States. “These are people who are committed to destroying our way of life,” Hoekstra said. “There is a reason we picked Guantanamo – you can’t get there.”

Also speaking against the transfer of detainees was Debra Burlingame, founder of 9/11 Families for a Safe and Strong America and sister of Charles Burlingame III, pilot of the plane hijacked by Muslim extremists and crashed into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001.

Burlingame spoke softly, but her message resonated with the crowd. She said bringing the Guantanamo detainees to Standish – or anywhere else in the United States – is a “colossally bad idea.” She cited Standish’s proximity to Midland, home of the Dow Chemical Co., as one of her main concerns. Burlingame said Standish would become a target, and the crowd fell silent as she told of Muslim extremists committing attacks against Americans, at home and abroad.

“These detainees are not like ordinary criminals,” she said. “Detainees live for martyrdom operations.” Burlingame also said she, along with other family members of Sept. 11 victims, met with President Barack Obama in February and asked the president why he wouldn’t try to rehabilitate Guantanamo’s image instead of closing it.

The answer she demonstrated for the crowd – a shrug – prompted gasps from the audience. “You are owed a better answer than that,” Burlingame said as the crowd gave her a standing ovation.

“What you do here, make no mistake, they are watching in Washington,” Burlingame said. “And if we can kill it here, maybe we can kill it everywhere and keep Guantanamo open.”

Congressman Hoekstra’s office put out a statement this afternoon:

Aug. 20, 2009, For Immediate Release, Press Contact: Dave Yonkman (202) 225-4401
Hoekstra Makes Case against ‘Gitmo North’ at Standish Town Hall.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra, R-Mich., the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, today spoke at a town hall meeting in Standish, Mich., where he made the point that the future of Michigan lies in creating jobs in tourism, advanced research and new technology, not “Gitmo Jobs.”

“As a former business marketing executive for a Fortune 500 company, experience tells me that making Michigan home to the world’s most dangerous terrorists will not make it more attractive for tourists, families or potential job providers,” said Hoekstra. “We need state leaders to pursue jobs for the future, the kind of jobs that attract new families and new business investment — in advanced technologies and automotive research, in medicine and science, and in agriculture and tourism, which will surely suffer as the state’s reputation is transformed from that of ‘Pure Michigan’ into the terrorist prison peninsula.”

Hoekstra has led the effort in Michigan and in Washington, D.C. against the Obama administration’s proposed plan to transfer terrorist detainees from Guantanamo Bay to a state prison, citing safety concerns for Michigan families. He also questioned the administration’s failure to demonstrate why Michigan would make a better alternative to the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay that was designed and built specifically to house al-Qaeda and other terrorist detainees at significant taxpayer expense.

“The administration is reportedly making pie-in-the-sky promises to local officials, but there is no guarantee that the federal and military jobs at Guantanamo Bay will go to local prison guards,” Hoekstra said. “The administration’s lack of transparency and willingness to provide actual data on Gitmo and its detainees also raises significant doubts about the hard sell they are putting on local officials. I have led the effort in Congress for openness and transparency on this issue for all Americans, and until the president actually shows it, the people of Michigan would be wise to be wary of feds bearing so-called gifts.”


Nearly every speaker during the two-hour gathering denounced the idea, many arguing that the 229 detainees should remain where they are, despite Obama’s pledge to close the Guantanamo complex by 2010. “They are enemy combatants,” said Tom Kerrins, chief steward for the union representing prison workers at Standish Maximum Correctional Facility. “They want to kill you, they want to kill me, they want to kill our families.”

Despite the one-sided tenor of the meeting, some officials in the town of 1,500 said in interviews that a “silent majority” of local residents would accept the detainees in order to save the prison, which is scheduled to close this year because of state budget cuts. The prison provides about 300 jobs, making it the top employer in the rural community about 145 miles north of Detroit where the jobless rate exceeds 17 percent. It covers about 25 percent of the municipal budget with payments for water and sewer service. “I’m hearing mixed feelings, but most of the people I’m talking to are for it,” said Lester Cousineau Jr., a city councilman. “If that prison closes, we’re done.”

Kerrins, though, said that federal guards — not the existing state crew — likely would staff the prison if Guantanamo detainees came.

  4 comments for “Standish, Michigan crowd against bringing Gitmo detainees

  1. eyesopen1972
    August 20, 2009 at 9:02 pm

    Michigan the worlds DUMPING Ground… first Canadian garbage and now terrorists!!!

    What no one EVER thinks of… First, you may say that there is nothing worth blowing up in Standish but what about the rest of the state of Michigan? You Scream that it is a maximum security prison but you do not need to get over or under the walls to escape, that is what the internet is for and once they have access to a computer they have access to you!!! You scream Geneva Convention and yet they are not combatants from another government so they do not and should not enjoy that privilege.

    You all forget that the government classifies them NOT as prisoners but as “Detainees” and this is something that EVERYONE seems to forget. They are people who are known to be enemies against the State and they want you DEAD because you are you and that is it. They are called “Detainees” because they haven’t been charged and tried. They still want you DEAD. So many want to be “liked” by countries around the world and yet when asked, no one wanted them. I have been asked; “What if you were taken by another country for no reason?” My answer, “Their own country does not want them back, so what does that say about them?”

    The most important thing to remember is once they step foot on American Soil they get Due Process to a speedy trial and if the government cannot make a case right now they get off “Scott Free”. Free to roam the Michigan landscape. Free to walk thru our Cities. Free to walk in our malls. Free to visit our schools and is it worth the jobs in Standish? Has anyone done a cost analysis on keeping them verse NOT? What will it cost to kep them in an “American prison verse Gitmo because here they get the American prison life style.

    Once they step foot on American soil “WE” now have to support them with our tax dollars and our communities. We will NOT be able to “Keep an eye” on them because then they can sue for harassment and win big and then fund a new strike. (Just one possibility)

    AMERICAN!!!! Stop thinking about the here and now and think about the tomorrow and what could happen. THINK and not what the press wants you to think.

  2. Fred
    August 20, 2009 at 7:08 pm

    God Bless the families of the victims of 9-11. I feel like I am in a nightmare with Obama letting the terrorists on to American soil, celebrating their dastardly deeds. I didn’t lose a loved one on 9-11, I lost a lot of loved ones on 9-11, fellow Americans. I have not forgotten.

  3. August 20, 2009 at 7:06 pm

    There is no way in hell that judges can, under the law, permit any people to be retained in prison without a trial and conviction. Debra knows that, I know that and the President knows that, therefore their release into America is his goal. What he says is his goal is irrelevant to what his actions tell us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *