Yesterday, 223 House Democrats (and Ron Paul) voted down a motion to recommit H.R. 2892. In effect, they voted:
1) to bring Guantanamo al Qaeda detainees into the U.S. and 2) to delete this additional requirement: “the Secretary of Homeland Security shall conduct a threat assessment for each such individual who is proposed to be transferred to the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, or the United States Territories.”
President Barack Obama and his administration applauded the House vote:
The Obama White House hailed a House vote Thursday to defeat a GOP-led effort to block the transfer of any Guantanamo Bay detainee to US soil — even for prosecution. “This was the most important legislative vote out there and it gives us a sense of victory,” said a senior administration official close to White House deliberations on closing the detention facility.
(Victory? Hurray! President Obama finally knows how to define victory.)
“It give [sic] us the fundamental ability to close down Guantanamo,” the official said. “And on the political side of it at least we’ve stabilized and we’ re dealing with the hysteria we dealt with this spring.” But the White House was not so celebratory as to release a formal statement praising the House vote. Another top White House aide said it’s too early to draw attention to Guantanamo policy because variables dealing with security, detention and trial of suspected terrorists remain unsettled. “We don’t want to be spiking the football on the 20 yard line,” the aide said. “We still have a ways to go.”
The House voted 224-193 to allow detainees to moved to the US for trial. The vote came on a amendment to the $42.8 billion Homeland Security spending bill. That overall bill passed 307-114 and now moves to the Senate, where swift passage is expected. Obama could sign the bill as early as next week.
In fact, a non-binding vote to that effect on Oct. 1 temporarily scuttled the Homeland Security spending bill. In that vote, 88 Democrats broke ranks and sided with Republicans who pushed the measure to derail Obama’s attempt to close Guantanamo. Today, 63 Democrats switched sides, clearing the way for the Homeland Security spending bill. … [also read this]
Who exactly are the Democrats who likely used their previous vote to tout to their constituents that they are “tough on terror?”
Voted to allow detainees into the U.S. on October 15, 2009 after voting to block them on October 1, 2009:
6 Democrats dodged the vote this time around were:
Boyd (Voted to block detainees on October 1, 2009)
McCollum (Voted to allow detainees into the U.S. on October 1, 2009)
Melancon (Voted to block detainees on October 1, 2009)
Minnick (ID) (Voted to block detainees on October 1, 2009)
Mollohan (Voted to block detainees on October 1, 2009)
Ryan (OH) (Voted to allow detainees into the U.S. on October 1, 2009)
Notes: A very small number of Democrats who voted to allow detainees into the U.S. last time actually voted yesterday to block them. Yet they are hard to discern and I’ve a headache from comparing the lists. If you spot one or more of those very confused Congressmen, send me an email at firstname.lastname@example.org and I’ll list them. Another pair of eyes compared the two votes and found Democrats Reps. Nye, Bishop (GA) and Bishop (NY) also switched their votes to allow terrorists to come to America.