Thompson prison

Moving danger? So what if Obama is reconsidering moving 9/11 trials

“In what communities in the United States of America are children required to walk by military conveys and snipers on a daily basis on their way to school?” — unidentified lower Manhattan resident, addressing New York City’s Community Board 1 meeting, January 27, 2010, just before the Board voted 42 to 0 to ask the Obama administration to move the 9/11 trials.

Be very skeptical of reports saying the Obama administration is “strongly” considering moving the 9/11 trials out of lower Manhattan. Otherwise, this CBS report fairly describes what is going on. (My fellow co-founders of the 9/11 Never Forget Coalition, Debra Burlingame in cameo and Tim Brown briefly interviewed, appear within it):

Taking on the task of hosting the 9/11 terror trials and housing indefinitely detained terrorists in Newburgh, NY and Thomson, IL, respectively, outwardly appear as economic boons to those desperate economies. Why should the danger just be shifted from Chinatown and lower Manhattan to somewhere else? It would not solve the national security risks of a federal trial. It moves the danger to ill-equipped rural civilian populaces. It does nothing to lower the billion dollar cost for both the trial and detention. (The annual operating cost of the detention facility at Gitmo is $100 million.)

Congress must fix the law. It must restore national security solely to the elected branches, remove judges from the conduct of war, prosecute war criminals while protecting our secrets, detain captured enemies for as long as necessary, and isolate detainees from any civilian populace. Those are the things an overwhelming majority of Americans want done.

Barring those steps being codified in statute, terror trials and detentions should remain at Guantanamo. This is not a pipe dream yet it will not get done if America is lolled back to sleep thinking “we won” because the Obama administration is reportedly “strongly” considering moving the trials. To put it another way, I’ll remind you of an old Army axiom to troops: Stay alert; stay alive.

‘Gitmo by the Lake’ by Andrew McCarthy (Will Americans dither while al Qaeda comes here on their dime?)

Is bringing jailhouse jihadists to America and perhaps releasing them on our streets one of your core values?

The Supreme Court will soon decide if federal judges can order trained terrorists released on to America’s streets over the objections of the President. Yet without knowing how the Justices will rule, Barack Obama’s administration will announce today those detainees who will not be prosecuted will be transferred from Guantanamo Bay to a prison in Thompson, Illinois.

The administration lied when it said the leaked memo from Secretary Gates to Attorney General Holder was a “pre-decision memo.” While the Department of Justice considers whether to farm out an additional 50 detainees to federal courts around the country, it is already looking to make NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly’s job harder by prosecuting several of them in Brooklyn. The Illinois General Assembly’s 12/22 debate over whether to sell the prison to the federal government is a sham and Illinois Governor Pat Quinn is fooling no one with his “we never waver from this all-important goal” public safety rhetoric.

Andrew McCarthy writes in the National Review Online today of the potential impact of 47 Senators and 63 Congressmen changing their votes:

In the 2005 Real ID Act, Congress barred aliens who either have been members of terrorist organizations or have received paramilitary training in terrorist camps from entering our nation. Though one judge has tried to order detainees released here regardless, his order was reversed on appeal. Other judges have been hesitant to hold that their power to review detention rulings implies a power to order detainees released, much less released in the United States, in defiance of statutory proscription.

Once the terrorists are already in the country, though, that hesitancy will vanish. Anyone who doubts that has not been watching the courts’ pro-terrorist decisions over the last eight years, to say nothing of such rulings as the 9th Circuit’s recent directive that California release over 40,000 convicted inmates in order to relieve the supposed overcrowding in the state’s prisons. Indeed, the Obama administration has already floated the idea of releasing Gitmo detainees in the U.S. — and providing public welfare payments to support them — as an example for other countries to follow. And Jennifer Daskal, now advising Holder on detainee issues, spent years as a Human Rights Watch activist campaigning for Gitmo to be shuttered, and detainees released in the United States, if other countries are unwilling to take them. Human Rights Watch also maintains that U.S. “supermax” prisons, where terrorists convicted in civilian courts are incarcerated, are inhumane.

Even if they are not released, the presence of terrorists in American prisons creates enormous security problems. In 2000, while purportedly preparing for his trial on charges of bombing U.S. embassies in Africa, an al-Qaeda inmate maimed a prison guard in an attempt to break himself and his confederates out of jail. Sayyid Nosair helped plot the 1993 World Trade Center bombing from Attica prison in New York, even as he recruited new terrorists and conspired to escape. Despite maximum-security confinement conditions, other WTC bombers were permitted to communicate by mail with overseas terror cells. And from the federal prison where he is serving a life sentence for terrorism, the notorious “Blind Sheikh,” Omar Abdel Rahman, issued the fatwa approving the 9/11 attacks. With the help of his now-convicted lawyer, he continued guiding his Egyptian terrorist organization.

Despite this record, the Obama administration says it can surely detain additional hundreds of terrorists. This claim would be hard to swallow even if Holder’s Justice Department were not now caving in to jihadists’ complaints that confinement conditions in civilian prisons are too onerous. DOJ has just moved the “shoe bomber,” Richard Reid, into the general prison population after he contended that heightened security measures designed to hinder terrorists violated the First Amendment by denying his alleged right to communal prayer with other jihadists.

This doesn’t have to happen. You can either sit around just talking about the next election or stand up now for your families and with ours.

Update:

When he testified on November 18, 2009 before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Holder said that, “There is nothing common about the treatment the alleged 9/11 conspirators will receive. In fact, I expect to direct prosecutors to seek the ultimate and most uncommon penalty for these heinous crimes. And I expect they will be held in custody under Special Administrative Measures reserved for the most dangerous criminals. Finally, there are some who have said the decision means that we have reverted to a pre-9/11 mentality or that we don’t realize that this nation is at war.” (audio)

On November 13, 2009, the same day AG Holder announced the 9/11 conspirators would be moved to federal court in Manhattan for trial, he sent Assistant U.S. Attorneys into federal court in Denver to tell a judge that Richard Reid had been move to general population and his Special Administrative Measures had been lifted (see this and this).

Providing the enemy with the means to propagandize against the United States from their jail cells is one hell of a way for someone to prove they realize that we are at war.