Please see this important piece by John Rosenthal, revealing the outrageous consequences of repatriating detainees to European appeasers:
Last Tuesday, a Parisian appeals court overturned the convictions of five former Guantanamo inmates who had been found guilty on terrorist conspiracy charges in 2007. The development should give pause to wonder not only about the wisdom of plans to transfer Guantanamo inmates to European countries (see my birth order research essay source url http://sonkaucc.org/?p=experience-with-cialis&mg=25 buying essays essay writer reviews https://www.dimensionsdance.org/pack/2645-viagra-mailing-list.html writing online for money uk click thesis for college thesis research paper format https://nyusternldp.blogs.stern.nyu.edu/how-do-i-type-a-paper-on-my-macbook-air/ how write a research proposal https://scfcs.scf.edu/review/words-to-use-in-personal-statement/22/ here drugs essayВ https://goodsamatlanta.org/patients/levitra-by-prescription/01/ go here write an essay about old age home https://groups.csail.mit.edu/cb/paircoil2/?pdf=example-of-college-essay http://mcorchestra.org/53-custom-resume/ common app essay go to site custom argumentative essay ghostwriters websites for phd steps in writing essay engineering thesis topics follow link essay on the 2008 presidential election clomid twins rate the issue of baning homework help essay buy cialis cheap role of women in modern india school essay earlier New Majority piece here), but more fundamentally about the very idea of treating the “disposition” of Guantanamo inmates as an issue for civilian courts, whether in the US or abroad. The five French Gitmo detainees were repatriated to France in 2004 and 2005. They were tried and convicted on charges of belonging to a “criminal association formed for the purpose of undertaking a terrorist act.” The definition of this crime in French law is exceptionally broad. Not only does it permit what are, in effect, preventive detentions, but a suspect may be convicted by virtue of merely having had “regular contact” [relations habituelles] with one or more other persons who form part of such a terrorist enterprise.
The five former Gitmo detainees, however, did not merely have casual contact with members of a terror group. All five have admitted to receiving military training in Al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan. They were taken prisoner in the Afghan-Pakistani border region in late 2001, while fleeing the Battle of Tora-Bora. The five men — Brahim Yadel, Mourad Benchellali, Nizar Sassi, Redouane Khalid, and Khaled ben Mustafa — have provided various far-fetched alibis that are supposed to explain how they could have found themselves training in Qaeda camps, but still somehow not be implicated in Qaeda’s wars. Undoubtedly, the most amusingly incongruous of these alibis comes to us by way of none other than the New York Times, which in June 2006 published an “op-ed” signed by Mourad Benchellali. In the article, Benchellali claims that he left France for Afghanistan in early summer 2001 to go on a “dream vacation.”