Tim Sumner

Cowards give up on GIs

Excepts from Ralph Peters’ column today:

The vote was a huge morale booster for al Qaeda, for Iraq’s Sunni insurgents, and for the worst of the Shia militias.

The message Congress just sent to them all was, “Hold on, we’ll stop the surge, we’re going to leave – and you can slaughter the innocent with our blessing.”

We’ve reached a low point in the history of our government when a substantial number of legislators would welcome an American defeat in Iraq for domestic political advantage.

Yes, some members voted their conscience. But does anyone believe they were in the majority?

This troop surge might not work. We can’t know yet. But we can be damned sure that the shameful action taken on the Hill while our troops are fighting isn’t going to help.

And a word about those troops: It’s going to come as a shock to the massive egos in Congress, but this resolution won’t hurt morale – for the simple reason that our men and women in uniform have such low expectations of our politicians that they’ll shrug this off as business as usual.

This resolution has teeth, though: It’s going to bite our combat commanders. By undermining their credibility and shaking the trust of their Iraqi counterparts, it makes it far tougher to build the alliances that might give Iraq a chance.

If you were an Iraqi, would you be willing to trust Americans and risk your life after the United States Congress voted to abandon you?

Now that Donald Rumsfeld’s gone, the Democrats are doing just what they pilloried the former Secretary of Defense for doing: Denying battlefield commanders the troops and resources they need.

Congresswoman Pelosi, have you no shame?

No, Colonel Peters, she and all 246 Members of Congress who voted as she did have no shame. And anyone one of them who says, “I support the troops,” is a liar for they do not even know what those words mean.

Mayor Mike’s memorial missing memory

Our good friends at Cox & Forkum Editorial Cartoons point out that civilians also died at Pearl Harbor and quote Park Ranger Jack G. Henkels explaining why the memorial in Hawaii was updated to include the ages of the victims.

And they use choice words to accurately describe Mayor Bloomberg’s proposal for the 9/11 memorial at the World Trade Center (click on the image):

un-memoriam.jpg

Yet, as I pointed out to them after seeing their cartoon, Mayor Bloomberg’s concept for a memorial leaves out more than the ages, locations, and the ranks of the military and first responders who died: 9/11.

That’s right. Mayor Bloomberg has decided that neither ‘9/11’ nor ‘September 11’ will appear on the memorial at Ground Zero.

Anything else missing? A flag.

Michael Bloomberg is obviously vying for the World’s Mayor title.

At the place where 9/11 began and ended, he has eliminated the American flag from the memorial plan.

How very PC of him

While we fully honor and respect the several hundred citizens from 90 other countries who were murdered on 9/11, Ground Zero was where Islamofascists first attacked America on its own soil.

September 11 is burnished into our collective memory and will long effect our nation’s course. America ought to mark the day and we ought to fly our flag. And we should do both at Ground Zero.