Tim Sumner

Fire, Not Explosion, Felled 7 W.T.C. (‘truther’ moonbats in mourning)

nist-video-of-why-wtc-7-fell.jpg

Click on image to view video or here to view NIST report

Link to New York Times article is courtesy of ScrewLooseChange.blogspot.com:

GAITHERSBURG, Md. — Fires in the 47-story office tower at the edge of the World Trade Center site undermined floor beams and a critical structural column, federal investigators concluded on Thursday, as they attempted to curb still-rampant speculation that explosives caused the building’s collapse on Sept. 11, 2001.

No one died when the tower, 7 World Trade Center, tumbled, as the estimated 4,000 office workers there at the time had evacuated before it gave way, nearly seven hours after the second of the twin towers came down.

But the collapse of 7 World Trade Center — home at the time to branch offices of the Central Intelligence Agency, the Secret Service and the Giuliani administration’s emergency operations center — is cited in hundreds of Web sites and books as perhaps the most compelling evidence that an insider secretly planted explosives, intentionally destroying the tower.

A separate, preliminary report issued in 2002 by the Federal Emergency Management Agency questioned whether diesel fuel tanks installed in the tower to supply backup generators — including one that powered the Giuliani administration’s emergency “bunker” — might have been to blame.

But S. Shyam Sunder, the lead investigator from the National Institute of Standards and Technology, based here in the suburbs of Washington, also rejected that theory on Thursday, even as he acknowledged that the collapse had been something of a puzzle.

“Our take-home message today is the reason for the collapse of World Trade Center 7 is no longer a mystery,” Dr. Sunder said at a news conference at the institute’s headquarters. “It did not collapse from explosives or fuel oil fires.”

Related posts:

Hours later, WTC 7 was completely engulfed

More evidence of Rosie O’Donnell’s ignorance

David Freddoso: ‘The Case Against Barack Obama’

Tuesday night, syndicated talk-radio host Mark Levin interviewed author David Freddoso about his new book ‘The Case Against Barack Obama.’

As the book’s synopsis states, in his book you will learn:

* How Barack Obama opposed a bill banning infanticide-by-neglect-a stance too extreme even for Nancy Pelosi. (Freddoso has an exclusive interview with the nurse central to the case.)

* How Obama’s friendship with the Reverend Jeremiah Wright was no accident, but a carefully thought-out personal and political decision

* Why Obama thought his association with the Reverend Wright and the terrorist Bill Ayers wouldn’t matter-an exposé of the insular radical chic of Chicago’s Hyde Parkpolitics

* What Obama really did for convicted developer Tony Rezko

* Debunking the myth of Obama’s “new” politics: the forgotten tale of how Obama won his first election by throwing all of his competitors off the ballot

* A story Obama would like to stay buried in Chicago: how he used his clout as a U.S. senator to save the corrupt Cook County Political Machine when reformers of both parties tried to challenge the entrenched political bosses

* How Obama has repeatedly steered taxpayer money to campaign donors