Political wind

9/11, Political wind

Arizona House votes to alter 9/11 memorial

by  • 

In 2006, Allahpundit at HotAir.com wrote of Arizona’s 9/11 memorial, “This is what happens to a memorial site when you let political activists design and build it.”

Arizona's 9/11 memorial

Back then, I added:

Across the street from the memorial in Phoenix sits a place for political discussions, Arizona’s state capitol building, which is where they should have left them. We objected to the now defunct International Freedom Center being on Ground Zero and becoming the gateway to the 9/11 memorial because it was going to be a $300 million center for political activism. A global network of human rights museums urged “the International Freedom Center to downplay America in its exhibits and programs at Ground Zero.” Instead of honoring the 9/11 dead at the memorial in Phoenix, they let political activists create a million dollar insult to them.

Fox News report on Arizona 9/11 memorial

Fox News’ William Lajeunesse asked Arizona 9/11 Memorial Commissioner Paul Eppinger to explain. When he responded, Eppinger revealed the commission had juxtaposed their own opinions of 9/11 onto the memorial:

“For me, what is means is that our foreign policy for years [emphasis added his] has focused on total support of Israel.”

When Lajeunesse asked him what [that] had to do with 9/11, Eppinger replied:

“I think that promoted the violence.” [Click here for the video]

In other words, 9/11 and the deaths of the 3,000 were America’s fault, we provoked al-Qaeda’s killers, according to Eppinger and the other activists on the commission.

This report is in The Arizona Republic this morning:

Arizona House votes to alter 9/11 memoria

An additional dozen inscriptions would be removed from the state’s embattled 9/11 memorial under a plan narrowly approved by House lawmakers Wednesday.

Those phrases — including “Must bomb back,” “Foreign-born Americans afraid” and “You don’t win battles of terrorism with more battles” — are etched into the memorial’s steel, disc-like face.

Memorial designers intended them to reflect the nation’s conflicted psyche in the days following the terrorist strikes of Sept. 11, 2001. Instead, they’ve helped keep the memorial roiled in controversy in the 18 months since its ’06 dedication.

“I’ve always been saddened by the controversy that has engulfed our 9/11 memorial,” said the bill’s sponsor, Rep. John Kavanagh, a Fountain Hills Republican and former Port Authority officer. “I think we’re very close to resolving that controversy.”

If that’s the case, it was anything but apparent Wednesday. The measure passed on a 32-26, nearly party-line vote, with all but one Republican voting in favor and all but one Democrat against.
…
The 9/11 citizens commission that helped design the memorial already is working on its own revisions to the structure. They include the removal of two inscriptions considered most objectionable — “Erroneous U.S. air strike kills 46 Uruzgan civilians” and “Terrorist organization leader addresses American people” — and the addition of six new phrases. They are to be carved into a new introductory panel to be placed at the entrance to the memorial.

Kavanagh and other lawmakers say those changes don’t go far enough and plan a new private fund-raising effort for the broader revisions called for by the bill.

We will be watching.

Late note: Our thanks to HotAir for linking over and their previous reports on this.

Barack Obama, Political wind

It is too late for Barack Obama to quit his racist church

by  • 

If Senator Barack Obama was solely a white politician and just now we learned he had attended a church for two decades founded on the principle of ‘white theology’ calling for “the destruction of the black enemy,” his run for the presidency would be over and calls for his resignation from the Senate would be heard from nearly every American. Yet he is not solely white.

From this morning’s Washington Times:

The church where Sen. Barack Obama has worshipped for two decades publicly declares that its ministry is founded on a 1960s book that espouses “the destruction of the white enemy.” Trinity United Church of Christ’s Web site says its teachings are based on the black liberation theology of James H. Cone and his 1969 book “Black Theology and Black Power.” “What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal. Unless God is participating in this holy activity, we must reject his love,” Mr. Cone wrote in the book. Mr. Cone, a professor at the Union Theological Seminary in New York, added that “black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy.”