CAIR

CAIR, Political wind

Only Arabic public school choice wrong: NY Sun

by  • 

New York City axed plans Friday for a publicly funded Arabic school in Brooklyn. The Khalil Gibran International Academy would have been co-located with P.S. 282 and its curriculum would have been “devoted to the study of the Arabic language and culture.” This morning, the New York Sun offered an equitable solution to liberals there while making no apologies for that newspaper’s critical commentaries of the school and its promoters:

“…Its principal, Dhabah “Debbie” Almontaser, accepted an award in 2005 from the Council on American-Islamic Relations. When Mayor Bloomberg in 2002 named a CAIR official to the city’s human relations commission, it set off a firestorm of complaints. CAIR had cosponsored an event at Brooklyn College where attendees chanted “no to the Jews, descendants of the apes,” and the organization posted a letter on its Web site suggesting that Muslims could not have been responsible for the attacks of September 11, 2001.

CAIR is a highly divisive institution in this city and country. It is funded in part by the same Saudi prince, Alwaleed bin Talal, whose $10 million donation Mayor Giuliani rejected after the terrorist attacks of September 11, when the prince called for America to rethink its support for Israel. When one of our reporters asked Ms. Almontaser whether she considers Hamas and Hezbollah to be terrorist organizations and who she thinks was behind the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, she declined to answer, suggesting she shouldn’t be singled out for such questions.

Yet if Ms. Almontaser cannot bring herself to address such questions from a newspaper, how is she going to do it in school? We do not believe such skepticism makes one intolerant, or, as some have insinuated, an anti-Arab or anti-Muslim bigot. Arabic Islamist terrorism in Brooklyn is a genuine threat. This is a city that saw Ari Halberstam shot to death on the Brooklyn Bridge after his assailant, Rashid Baz, listened to a sermon at the Islamic Society of Bay Ridge. And more recently saw a clerk at an Islamic bookstore in Bay Ridge, Shahawar Matin Siraj, convicted of a plot to blow up the Herald Square subway station.

Not long ago, a man from Yemen who owned an ice cream shop in Brooklyn was convicted of sending nearly $22 million abroad for use by a sheik with ties to Hamas and Al Qaeda. The “landmarks plot” to blow up the United Nations and the Lincoln and Holland Tunnels was hatched on Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn by Omar Abdel-Rahman and others. A civil rights lawyer and her interpreter were convicted of aiding Abdel-Rahman by transmitting messages from him to a terrorist organization in Egypt. This is not a time when concern over these issues can be dismissed as bigotry.
…
How to sort all this out? … A taxpayer-funded Arabic school would only underscore the injustice of allowing one group of parents to educate their own children in a school that elevates their language, civilization, and religion at taxpayer expense, while depriving other parents of the same choices. Our test for whether all of the parties to this controversy are standing on principle will be their position on vouchers.

Separating children in public schools from other cultures, religions, and ethnic groups does nothing to promote tolerance. CAIR attempted to create a mini-madrassa in Brooklyn and New York City officials once thought that was a good idea. Politicians wanted to make a political payoff to a targeted group using public funds. Yet those same politicians routinely cite the separation of church [and state] when denying school vouchers to those wishing to educate their children in other religiously oriented private schools.

6 imams, Aviation Security, CAIR, Political wind

Republicans ask Pelosi to ground Flying Imams’ lawsuit

by  • 

House Republicans are urging House Speaker Pelosi to retain, during the House-Senate conference, legislative language that would protect airline passengers who, acting in good faith, report suspicious behavior. The language was in response to ‘John Doe’ passengers being sued by six imams and CAIR, the Council of American-Islamic Relations, after they reported the imams’ suspicious behaviors aboard a US Airways flight last November. In March, 105 Democrats joined 199 Republicans to place the language into the House’s version of the Rail and Public Transportation Security Act of 2007, Today, the Washington Times reported:

Key Republicans are lobbying House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to protect legislation that prohibits airline passengers from being sued if they report suspicious behavior that foreshadows a terrorist attack. Republican leaders used a procedural motion to insert that provision into a transportation-safety bill last month, but House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer [emphasis added mine], Maryland Democrat, has threatened to bar from becoming law all language entered into bills under such “motions to recommit.”

“We cannot afford to wait any longer to protect individuals who seek to do the right thing by speaking up to prevent a terrorist attack,” more than a dozen Republicans wrote to Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat, today in a letter obtained in advance by The Washington Times.
…
“This represents a startling precedent, one that could freeze the very behavior law enforcement has encouraged,” the letter said.
…
“In light of the overwhelming support from the American public and House members, and despite opposition from a majority of House Democrats, we seek your commitment to retain the King Amendment in rail and mass-transit security legislation adopted in any conference report for H.R. 1 and S. 4,” said the letter to Mrs. Pelosi. “Your commitment to recognize the vote of more than 300 members is particularly important in light of Majority Leader Hoyer’s comments that Republican additions to bills can be removed easily in conference committee,” the letter said. The effort passed on a vote of 304-121, with 105 Democrats siding with all 199 Republicans who voted.

The letter was signed by Mr. King, House Minority Leader John A. Boehner of Ohio, Steve Pearce of New Mexico, Minority Whip Roy Blunt of Missouri, Adam H. Putnam of Florida, Eric Cantor of Virginia, Mark Souder of Indiana, Mike Rogers of Alabama, Michael McCaul of Texas, Bill Shuster and Charlie Dent of Pennsylvania, Dan Lungren of California and Dave Reichert of Washington.

“Open lines of communication are critical to both passenger security and our collective national security, and attempts to stifle such speech don’t serve the interests of the American people,” Mr. Boehner said. “We would certainly hope that Democratic conferees take this very seriously and let sound policy not partisan politics be the arbiter of what ends up in this conference report.”

READ THE REST