amnesty

Flight 327: a Washington Times editorial

A newly released report from the inspector general for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security about the government’s handling of 13 suspicious passengers on a June 29, 2004, Northwest Airlines flight serves as a reminder of why so many Americans are rightly skeptical of Washington’s ability to manage a mass-amnesty program. The report, which details what happened on the flight 327 from Detroit to Los Angeles, confirms eyewitness accounts describing suspicious behavior on the part of 12 Syrian musicians before and during the flight.

Initially, Homeland Security officials tried to downplay its seriousness and suggested that other passengers had overreacted. But the report corroborates the passengers’ accounts and suggests that what took place was a dry run for a terrorist attack — which first was reported by Audrey Hudson of The Washington Times. The report raises disturbing questions about the handling of the case by several agencies: Homeland Security, the Federal Air Marshal Service and the Citizenship and Immigration Services, which will play the lead role in overseeing the amnesty program for illegals.

Pilots and former air marshals told this newspaper that federal security managers have been concealing information on dry run probes from other federal agencies and that most of our flights today do not have armed pilots or air marshals aboard. And yet the president and “immigration reform” supporters on Capitol Hill insist that the dysfunctional bureaucracies responsible for Flight 327 security are up to the task of overseeing mass amnesty for illegals.

Related report: DHS IG’s report confirms terror dry run aboard Flight 327

Naughty at the border

Just click it.

Brought to you by Sout al-Kuffar@The Jawa Report.

Michelle Malkin (and I second it) says, “pass it on. Send it to the White House. And tell ’em to stop insulting the intelligence and integrity of those opposed to repeating another shamnesty disaster.”

A prime example of insulting the integrity of people is Linda Chavez’ branding everyone opposed to the immigration legislation a racist. Such a prejudicial statement indicates to me that Ms. Chavez needs to look in a mirror for the racist.