Tim Sumner

Iraq

Symposium on New York Times’ ‘A War We Just Might Win’

by  • 

The National Review Online posted a discussion about Monday’s assessment by two New York Times reporters (of all people). Here is a sampling:

Skipping past the blow-by-blow and getting to the bottom line: I sense there has been a fundamental shift in Iraq. One officer called it a “change in the seas,” and I believe his words were accurate. Something has changed. The change is fundamental, and for once seems positive. And so, back to the O’Hanlon-Pollack story in the New York Times, “A War We Just Might Win,” I agree. — Michael Yon, an independent writer, photographer, and former Green Beret who was embedded in Iraq for nine months in 2005. He has returned to Iraq for 2007 to continue reporting on the war. He is entirely reader supported and publishes his work at www.michaelyon-online.com.

—

But does it matter at this point? Time is running out, not in Iraq but in Washington, D.C., where, as more than one commentator has pointed out, the Democratic majority in Congress and the party’s presidential candidates all seem to have opted for defeat and disgrace. Thanks to these geniuses and the Republicans who enable them, we may be on the verge of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. — Mackubin Thomas Owens, an associate dean of academics and a professor of national-security affairs at the Naval War College in Newport, R.I. He is writing a history of U.S. civil-military relations.

And here is the link.

Political wind

Democrats rush to secrecy for pet projects

by  • 

The Washington Times slapped the wrong headline on their reporting this morning. ‘Democrats rush to strip secrecy from pet projects‘ could be mistaken to mean the Democrats are making earmarks less secret. Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) provided the chart below that shows the reverse is true, the ‘Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007’ is spin, and Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) are trying to con the American people. Senator Coburn added:

“Rather than opening the secret chambers of government to the public, this new Congress has opted to change the locks. This bill, which was negotiated in secret, guts key earmark reforms that both houses of Congress approved overwhelmingly. Unfortunately, this process shows that Congress’s 28 percent approval rating is well-deserved.

“The problem in Washington is not lobbyists, but members of Congress. This bill solves the wrong problem and creates new ways to hide earmarks. For example, it is ludicrous to give the Majority Leader of either party, not the objective Senate parliamentarian, new unilateral powers to police earmarks. It is also obscene that the Senate gutted a key reform preventing senators from directing earmarks to family members. The new language mirrors existing Senate rules which have done nothing to prevent these serious conflicts of interest.

“In the last election, the American people said they wanted the earmark favor factory to be shut down, not turned over to new management [emphasis added mine]. As our Republican majority learned, breaking promises has consequences. Congress first broke its promise to impose an earmark moratorium by offering 32,000 earmarks. Now Congress has signaled its determination to continue the secretive earmark favor factory.”

Reid and Pelosi's secret pork factory

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) said:

“The American people asked us in November to fix the way business gets done in Washington, and Democrats are heeding that call.”

Sorry America, wrong number.

So much for Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-CA) talk about returning transparency to government.

Hot Air and Pork Busters have much more on this.