Tim Sumner

Senators Clinton and Obama vote against intercepting terrorist communications

Their votes would not matter, surely they knew the Republicans had nowhere near the 60 votes needed, and the State of the Union Address was not until 9 PM. Yet Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama both made sure they arrived in Washington early enough yesterday to vote against intercepting terrorist communications. They joined forty-two other Senate Democrats and one Republican, Arlen Specter, in voting to prevent cloture of the debate over the ‘FISA Amendments Act of 2007? (S.2248).

This morning, the editors of the Wall Street Journal wrote:

As President, both Mrs. Clinton and rival Barack Obama would surely want the ability to spy on our enemies overseas. They are both smart enough to know, too, that much foreign communications pass through the U.S. owing to the nature of global electronic communications networks, a fact that FISA, written in 1978, takes no account of.

During his State of the Union Address last night, President Bush warned Congress of the consequences, should they fail to act this week:

On the home front, we will continue to take every lawful and effective measure to protect our country. This is our most solemn duty. We are grateful that there has not been another attack on our soil since 9/11. This is not for the lack of desire or effort on the part of the enemy. In the past six years, we’ve stopped numerous attacks, including a plot to fly a plane into the tallest building in Los Angeles and another to blow up passenger jets bound for America over the Atlantic. Dedicated men and women in our government toil day and night to stop the terrorists from carrying out their plans. These good citizens are saving American lives, and everyone in this chamber owes them our thanks.

And we owe them something more: We owe them the tools they need to keep our people safe. And one of the most important tools we can give them is the ability to monitor terrorist communications. To protect America, we need to know who the terrorists are talking to, what they are saying, and what they’re planning. Last year, Congress passed legislation to help us do that. Unfortunately, Congress set the legislation to expire on February the 1st. That means if you don’t act by Friday, our ability to track terrorist threats would be weakened and our citizens will be in greater danger. Congress must ensure the flow of vital intelligence is not disrupted. Congress must pass liability protection for companies believed to have assisted in the efforts to defend America. We’ve had ample time for debate. The time to act is now. [emphasis added his]

Five of the six Democrats (Rockefeller, Wyden, Bayh, Mikulski, and Whitehouse) on the Senate Intelligence Committee, who had joined seven Republicans in a bi-partisan vote, 13-2, to send the measure to the Senate floor, also voted against cloture. Senator Bill Nelson of Florida did not vote.

McCain must have just fell off the ‘Straight-Talk Express’

For years, dual citizen Juan Hernandez has publicly called for the free flow of people between Mexico and the United States, brushing aside critics of his ‘no border’ advocacy by saying, “It really is a region.” Former Mexican President Vincente Fox appointed him as cabinet minister on immigration issues. He has known President George W. Bush since 1995 and quietly became John McCain’s Hispanic Outreach Director this past November. Yet at a townhall-style campaign meeting yesterday, when asked about Mr. Hernandez, Senator McCain acted a bit naive:

“I don’t know what his previous positions are…”

Yet clipping a few words from a Q&A exchange perhaps fails to provide context. That quote needs a transcript and video. Luckily, Bryan Preston of HotAir.com provided both:

QUESTION: Senator McCain, I thank you so much for your service … as an Irish … my parents and my grandparents both came here to become immigrants … I so much want to vote for you, I have one concern … your straight talk … it is you have an outreach — Hispanic outreach person — on your staff, Juan Hernandez, and he has said that he understands why Social Security numbers are stolen … because we don’t allow the immigrants to get their own, so it’s ok for him that we steal other Americans’ Social Security numbers. He also has written a book called “The New American Pioneers” about comparing illegal immigrants, not legal immigrants, to become the “New Pioneers” … I wonder if you agree with his policy? If so, explain it to me and if not why is he on your staff?

SENATOR JOHN MCCAIN: He’s on my staff because he supports my policies and my proposals and my legislative proposal to secure the borders first. No one will receive social security benefits who is in this country illegally. I don’t know what his previous positions are or other positions are, he supports mine. I have nothing to do with his. He has volunteered to help me with outreach to our Hispanic citizenry as I outreach to every citizen in America. I’ve been very clear on my position on immigration; I’ve been very clear on my position on Social Security. Of course I am grateful that so many people came from Ireland to the United States of American and anybody else who come here legally and that’s the only system I will ever support. I have no idea but I will check in to the information you’ve given me. I promise you, I will secure our borders, I will not allow anyone to come here illegally, I will not allow anyone to receive Social Security or any other benefits because they have come here illegally and broken our laws.

Senator McCain is advising his own advisor on immigration issues, not the other way around?

The Washington Times’ headline this morning reads McCain sees attrition as way to ease illegal entries:

Now, Mr. McCain says that he would focus first on border security, that 2 million criminal illegal aliens should be deported outright, and that only after the borders are secure and a worker-verification program is in place should illegal aliens get a path to citizenship [emphasis added mine].

The program’s host, Jorge Ramos, asked Mr. McCain if that meant no legalization program “for the first two or three years,” and Mr. McCain seemed to concur.

“I am saying that in the first year or two years at the present pace we can get the border secured, and then we can address the other part of it. The American people want the border secured first, and that is what we have to do,” Mr. McCain said, according to an English transcript provided by [Univision].

It is difficult to believe he “got the message.” Perhaps John McCain should solely tout the legal path to citizenship — the one already in place — but he will never hear that advice from Juan Hernandez.